On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:48 AM Petr Lautrbach <[email protected]> wrote:
> As none of packages which require either libsepol or libsemanage use dropped > symbols and in order not to break build root during soname bumps I've added > temporary > subpackages with original library versions - libsepol-compat with > libsepol.so.1 > and libsemanage-compat with libsemanage.so.1. These subpackage will be dropped > as soon as everything is rebuilt in Rawhide. For some reason I thought libXXXX-compat package naming was deprecated in favor of libXXXX1 package naming (or libXXXX_1 if the last X was a number) for a .1 soname example. Although as a temporary bypass that is going away before it is exposed in a release I doubt it really matters, but is my understanding correct about the preferred new naming conventions? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
