* Fabio Valentini: > Looks like the most recent glibc update in rawhide broke some stuff, > including running dnf: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in <module> > from dnf.cli import main > File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in > <module> > import dnf.base > File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 29, in <module> > import libdnf.transaction > File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/libdnf/__init__.py", line > 12, in <module> > from . import conf > File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/libdnf/conf.py", line 13, in > <module> > from . import _conf > ImportError: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0: undefined symbol: lstat64, > version GLIBC_2.33 > > dnf not working is clearly bad because it will prevent users who get > the broken glibc update from fixing things, right?
I'm pretty sure this is the result of *not* updating glibc. Did you attempt a partial upgrade of rawhide, restricting the package set during an update? I cannot reproduce this: In the current compose and buildroot, libglib-2.0.so.0 and libc.so.6 are consistent. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
