El mié., 7 oct. 2020 a las 10:35, Petr Menšík (<[email protected]>)
escribió:
>
>
> On 10/7/20 6:44 AM, Pavel Zhukov wrote:
> >
> > I don't think it's a good idea.
> > dnsmasq is not dns resolver but acts as DHCP and DNS server. It provides
> > VMs with IP
> > address/lease and create corresponding dns record for it. In case of
> > resolved ip addresses and dns records must be managed either manually
> > or... with dnsmasq.
>
> That is not true. Any query sent to @192.168.122.1 would get reply. I
> use for example unbound on localhost and all my machines use .vm. domain
> suffix. rhel7.vm. is machine with rhel7. Dnsmasq manages automatically
> lease names of all its dhcp clients, it works as dynamic DNS connected
> with DHCP just out of the box.
>
I've created a libvirt hook to do the integration I was looking for. This
works for me:
/etc/libvirt/hooks/network.d/laptop-lab.sh
#!/bin/bash
set -o nounset
object="$1"
operation="$2"
suboperation="$3"
extra="$4"
if [ "$object" == "laptop-lab" ]; then
if [ "$operation" == "started" ] && [ "$suboperation" == "begin" ]; then
/usr/bin/resolvectl dns laptop-lab 192.168.100.1
/usr/bin/resolvectl domain laptop-lab laptop.lab
/usr/bin/resolvectl dnssec laptop-lab no
fi
fi
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
