anyone else more confused?
On 9/30/20 1:26 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> And like it or not, all our legacy network configuration mechanisms
> are deprecated and*will be removed eventually*.
is plain-vanilla systemd-networkd -- no NM wrapper around it, no (in)direct
dependency on systemd-resolved -- considered 'legacy'?
> Moreover, *all* Fedora variants use NetworkManager. *ALL* OSTree
variants, as shipped today, *MUST* use NetworkManager.
how 'bout I turn the question around ...
what specific steps must be done POST- F32->F32 upgrade to
(1) not use NetworkManager
(2) not use systemd-resolved
(3) return/preserve local configs for systemd-networkd & 'enterprise'
(own resolver) DNS configs?
?
> Regular Fedora is considerably more
customizable post-installation than OSTree-based variants.
For those of us that don't live&breathe the lingo, it's not exactly clear what
'Regular Fedora' is.
Is there _any_ variant of Fedora that's immune now, and in the planned future,
from "use NetworkManger" and (therefore) systemd-resolved?
Iiuc, the upgrades WILL install/enable systemd-resolved; that's post-upgrade
maintenance that apparently needs to be planned for -- as long as its still
doable.
If/when does that no longer remain an option?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
