Neal Gompa <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:10 PM Robbie Harwood <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > * Have an expedited flow where this SIG can request EPEL branches and >> > admin access to packages if there are no response from package >> > maintainers for a set period (3 days? 1 week?) >> > * whether it should be full admin access or whether such access >> > should be scoped to epel* branches can be discussed. Full admin would >> > make it possible to adjust the spec in Rawhide to be more EPEL >> > friendly, for example >> >> Unless I've missed something, we still don't have per-branch ACLs in >> dist-git. >> >> I don't think it's okay to force maintainers to give you admin or commit >> to their packages just because you want them in EPEL. >> >> (I'm also not one of the kind of people who really like having one spec >> file for all versions of the package, but I know others disagree with me >> on this. Certainly if hypothetically I didn't want to maintain an EPEL >> package I wouldn't want its logic /also/ foisted on me in rawhide.) > > We have per-branch ACLs in Dist-Git since early August. The > collaborator role in Pagure lets you grant people commit access for > specific branches.
Excellent! Thanks, --Robbie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
