On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 16:14, Jared Dominguez <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 3:41 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 30.06.2020 19:43, Hans de Goede wrote: >> > That is the first time I have heard that. Do you have a source for that ? >> >> https://github.com/intel/dptfxtract - no sources, only proprietary binaries. >> >> The legal status of the extracted tables was discussed a few months ago >> with members of the Fedora legal team. You can check archives. > > > Regardless of the legality of tables output from dptfxtract, that doesn't > really address the fact that thermald, as is in Fedora 32 today (version > 1.9.1 from December) doesn't have dptfxtract (nor do later versions bundle > it) and results in an improvement in thermal behavior on supported systems > without any thermal tables in /etc/thermald. >
I am going to say citation is needed here as much as Vitaly's comments. What systems does it work with? How does it work on these systems? What systems does it not work on? Are the various problems from the last time this was discussed to death https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/D4FVY3LLMNGUKNUOEIDXNOOAD577W5XN/ been dealt with? -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
