On 6/15/20 9:13 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Ondrej Dubaj: > >> The problem is unknown runtime behaviour of libdb-java (build with >> jdk-1.8, as it is unable to build with jdk-11) with JVM-11. Are you an >> active user of libdb java ? > > I am not. > > Upon second thought, it doesn't seem to make sense to preserve > libdb-java (although I expect that it's only necessary to fix the > autoconf check).
Maybe. However upstream of is dead. And usptream confirmed that they are unable to verify that it works in JDK11. Imho droppoing such possibly instbale package is probably good way. If it will be missed, then it can be returned, and the one wishing its return will be used as tester. Is there some replacemnt for this subpackage? At least theoretical? > > Thanks, > Florian > _______________________________________________ > java-devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] > -- Jiri Vanek Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr. Red Hat Czech [email protected] M: +420775390109 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
