On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 16:59 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 4:24 PM Alex Scheel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Let's try this with the right Florian... > > > > > > Sorry! > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Alex Scheel" <[email protected]> > > > To: "Florian Weimer" <[email protected]> > > > Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > > <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 4:02:48 PM > > > Subject: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31? > > > > > > Hi Florian, > > > > > > I've hit numerous bugs in GNOME in F31. Some of these are fixed in F32, > > > such as this one against mutter: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770296 > > > > > > > > > Could we get some of these fixes backported? I've not heard from you on > > > this bug at all, despite a needinfo request since March. > > Just a curious observation/question. Backports can often be time > consuming and expensive. Is there something preventing you from > upgrading to Fedora 32?
I don't know about Alex, but in general, upgrading can also be time consuming and expensive, so some of our users prefer to only upgrade every second release. There will be people who will keep running 31 until 33 comes out. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
