On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 2:01 PM Bohdan Khomutskyi <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I'd suggest not selecting any specific area to concentrate on, but to
> achieve an all-good solution that will combine the benefits, without
> specializing in one particular area.
>
Even if you can achieve some modest improvement in all areas together, you
still need to decide whether you prefer "50% improvement in area 1, and 2%
improvement in area 2 and 3" or "5% improvement in area 1, 2 and 3" (random
numbers used). So you need to decide your priorities, and usually not in
absolute scale ("area 1 is the top-most priority at all costs") but in
relative scale ("I'm willing to sacrifice that much in area 2 in order to
improve area 1 by this much"). Of course this is hard to codify, unless you
fancy writing a science paper with complicated equations, but mostly it's
enough to look at the numbers and pick the candidate that feels like
satisfying your preferences in the best way.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
