On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:00 AM Chris Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:39 PM Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 07:15:39PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This might be a bad idea. But I'm looking for better ideas than status 
> > > quo.
> > >
> > > A known problem is upgraded systems get crusty over time. Maybe folks
> > > should clean install more often, yet they don't.
> > >
> > > If there's a new good idea, but it's a short term solution, the fact it'll
> > > live forever acts as a deterrent to implementing it.
> > >
> > > What if there were an autoremove for anything older than Fedora n-2, that
> > > is, keep current plus last two releases? i.e. for upgrades to Fedora 33,
> > > keep stale packages from 33, 32, and 31.
> > >
> > > Or another idea?
> >
> > Well, we already have fedora-obsolete-packages. That should handlle this
> > case no? Folks who want to have obsolete things removed can make sure to
> > have fedora-obsolete-packages installed and it should obsolete those.
>
> It's not installed by default. Should it be?
>

fedora-obsolete-packages is a self-destructing package. It is
installed as part of your transaction to clean up packages and then
removed afterward.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to