On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 07:25 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > Le jeudi 21 novembre 2019 à 01:02 +0100, Kevin Kofler a écrit : > > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > Today, builds submitted by MBS made up more than 80% of total > > > builds, > > > or over 5x the number of "normal" builds. > > > What an incredible waste of resources. > > > > Especially considering what small percentage of the packages is > > actually in > > modules. If more packages modularize, Koji will break down > > completely. > > Especially since the *actual* request made by language SIGs was to > provide a way infra side to make mass rebuilds faster, because > compiler/interpreter language changes require rebuilding everything > periodically, and the rebuild window is a period where things scrawl to > a halt for new language packages. > > MBS achieves the exact reverse: rebuild everything when there’s no deep > need, removing infra resources that could be used to make actual mass > rebuilds, triggered by upstream changes, faster. I seem to remember from early modularity demos that MBS dis some pretty elaborate caching of builds. Is that not applicable here or did it never end up in production MBS deployment ?
> > regards, > > -- > Nicolas Mailhot > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
