On 19. 11. 19 21:55, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:32 PM Miro Hrončok <[email protected]> wrote:
On 19. 11. 19 20:20, Adam Jackson wrote:
In the spirit of positivity and collaboration, I spent a few minutes
looking at the results given to try to find some easy wins. Here's what
I found:
python3-libs ships multiple copies of its pyc files, corresponding to
different optimization levels. I don't know what a good packaging
solution to that would look like, but if we only shipped the -O2 kind
(which seems appropriate for minimization, as they're smallest) we
could drop about 13M out of 32M, which seems pretty great.
Note that it would make more sense to drop the optimized ones, as most of our
packages invoke Python without -O or -OO.
It would certainly need more planning and figuring out what shall happen if the
optimized bytecode is not there and users actually run Python with -O or -OO,
but we can discusses that if you want.
I wonder, does running python programs with -O2 actually yield
noticeably better performance?
If that's the case, maybe we could discuss setting -O2 as a
distro-wide default setting?
It drops asserts and docstrings. Some code require both to function, hence
defaulting to this would be dangerous.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
