Randy Barlow wrote:
> Nix might be the only solution that avoids this since it has the most
> advanced form of parallel installability. I've not used Nix before, but
> it sounds pretty cool.
Unfortunately, Nix uses a completely non-standard (non-FHS) file system
layout, essentially the Windows one. In Fedora/RHEL terms, think "every
package is an SCL". That approach has major drawbacks, too.
I think there is no way around 1. per-package deconflicting for parallel
installability (while maximizing FHS compliance) and 2. banning parallel
availability for any non-leaf package for which point 1 has not yet been,
cannot be, or will not be done. (Leaves can usually get away without
parallel installability.)
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
