On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 22:21:39 +0100
Tom Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17/10/2019 21:39, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:21:44 PM EDT Tom Hughes wrote:
> >> On 17/10/2019 20:44, Steve Grubb wrote:
> >>> I don't think __x86_64__ is defined as the program is aimed at
> >>> eBPF in the
> >>> kernel. In rawhide, we no longer have glibc-devel(x86-32) to
> >>> allow this to
> >>> resolve. However, I think that the assumption of not having
> >>> __x86_64__ defined means we are targeting i686 is wrong. What
> >>> should I do? Do we not support eBPF programs on Fedora?
> >>
> >> I can still see glibc-devel.i686 in rawhide which provides that.
> >
> > In rawhide I got [1]:
> >
> > No matching package to install: 'glibc-devel(x86-32)'
> >
> > But on my local system, F30, it works fine.
>
> I just tried it with mock on F30:
>
> mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --install 'glibc-devel(x86-32)'
>
> and that worked fine.
>
> >> As far as I know the 32 bit multilib packages aren't going away.
> >
> > Hmm. I still wonder if the headers might need reworking to not
> > assume 32 bit if the target is bpf.
>
> I don't know enough about how the BPF backend works to be
> able to comment on that.
I guess the problem will be building in koji, it isn't multi-lib
capable.
Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
