Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Another benefit of this would be that the "*-modular" repositories
> could be disabled by default, which would eliminate a whole lot of
> upgrade issues for "normal users".
> Only people who *actually want* alternate versions would enable
> modules (and *-modular repos?), and they can then expected to know how
> to handle upgrade issues.
+1. I don't understand why Modularity was not implemented that way to begin
with.
> I think that letting people drop ownership and maintenance of "normal
> packages" and *only* doing modules instead was a mistake. But that's
> just my opinion ;)
+1, not just yours. ;-)
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
