Once upon a time, Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> said: > I think having a record of upstream SCM would be useful regardless. Many > times when submitting patches to Fedora packages, I've been told to send > my patch to upstream instead....which means trying to figure out where > that upstream is for this given RPM.
"rpm -qi" and look at the URL? The other thing that makes source code changelogs less useful in some cases is that they are often very verbose, with info that isn't clear to end users. They show changes that are often not relevant (like maybe between release 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 they tried a fix to a bug and reverted it - who cares in terms of RPMs?). -- Chris Adams <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
