Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 03. 10. 19 1:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> I'm not sure how to handle the dychomoty between having different spec
>> files for each release and wanting to maintain just one spec that has a
>> bunch of crazy conditionals in it. Even thought I do this too, I think
>> we need a workflow that discourages this somehow.
>
> I believe that moving release tag and changelog entry to annotated tags
> solves this problem (or makes it insignificant).
>
> It means you can just cleanly cherry pick a fix anywhere it is relevant
> (most of the time) instead of fighting the changelog conflicts all the
> time.
I don't understand the people actually maintaining different changelogs for
the releases. I just merge master into the release branches when I push an
update, and if that includes some changelog entries for Rawhide-only mass
rebuilds, so be it. Removing them is not worth breaking fast-forwardability
of the branches.
I even go as far as reverting branch-only commits and then doing the
bidirectional merge trick to restore fast forwardability. That of course
clobbers the branch-only changelog section and replaces it with the one from
master, but that's just how things are. Again, I think fast-forwardability
is more useful than per-branch changelogs.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
