On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 4:41:29 PM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 10. 19 16:24, [email protected] wrote: > > > Another possibility would be to switch to a noarch package, but in the > > future I would like to package the CGAL examples and demos as > > sub-packages. > > You should not do that, see the "Do not use noarch" part of: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_packaging_header > _only_libraries Thanks. That part of the guidelines seems what I was looking for.
... But I have another concerned, compare to header-only C++ libraries (like eigen3-devel): what will be the upgrade path? If I remove the main package `CGAL` (and keep only `CGAL-devel`), nothing will provide an upgrade path from CGAL-4.14.1-1. I could create a fake noarch sub-package 'CGAL-upgrade-to-header-only', with a versionned Obsoletes:, and an ad-hoc %doc file, but that looks like an ugly hack. -- Laurent Rineau, PhD R&D Engineer at GeometryFactory http://www.geometryfactory.com/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
