Richard Shaw wrote:
> I also ran a diff from the same Pivy compiled with Coin3 and Coin4 and the
> ONLY significant difference is where the asterisk is on the QWidget lines:
>
> Coin3: ...(QWidget *...
> Coin4: ...(QWidget*...
>
> Does the space between QWidget and asterisk make a difference?
It should not. The C++ compiler does not care either way, it is the same
type. Whitespace is not syntactic in C/C++, unless it splits a token into 2
(e.g. "long int").
QWidget *foo, QWidget* foo, QWidget*foo, and QWidget * foo are all valid
ways to spell the same declaration.
QWidget *foo is really how the language works, e.g., you have to write
QWidget *foo, *bar; to get 2 pointers, QWidget* foo, bar; will be read as
QWidget *foo, bar; and give you only one pointer and one stack-allocated
object. So IMHO QWidget *foo is the correct way to write it. But many
developers prefer QWidget* foo because they say the * is part of the type
and should be attached to the type.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
