Ok, that makes sense; thanks for the clarification. :) On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:03 AM Miro Hrončok <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 19. 08. 19 15:31, Chris wrote: > > I'm getting a rawhide (auto) build issue with my package: > > Error: churchyard's python-apprise-0.7.9-3.fc32 failed to build > > > > Source: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1359009 > > Note that this is not a rawhide build but a f32-python side tag build. > > > When you follow through to the error it comes down to the build.log > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6735/37146735/root.log > > > > Which shows that the 'Requires: python3-requests-oauthlib' is hauling in > the > > version from fc31 and failing on: > > `nothing provides python(abi) = 3.7` > > > > This is more of a question to the forum; not a complaint: > > > > Will my package that failed to build due to a dependency issue global to > rawhide > > be rebuilt when the bad dependency is eventually upgraded to Python > 3.8? Or do > > I need to rebuild it myself again later and pass it through testing? > > I am taking care of all the rebuilds that are possibly to be made. That > means if > python-requests-oauthlib is able to be rebuilt, python-apprise will be > rebuilt > as well. However if python-requests-oauthlib fails to build for other > reason > than failed dependency (or transitively a dependency of it fails), I will > not > rebuild it. > > In this case, python-requests-oauthlib was already built and so was > python-apprise. > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
