Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> > "The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the >> > *binary* rpm." >> >> Thank you - somehow I missed that part. >> >> Felix > > Shouldn't that depend on the license? The source code is normally > contained in the SRPM. Would it make sense to segregate that source > code into a different package with a distinct license, if possible?
No (imo, that would over-complicate things for little to no gain). -- Rex _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
