> > BuildRequires: selinux-policy
> > BuildRequires: /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile
>
>
> Thank you for the feedback. You are correct that the BuildRequires in
> the macro are useless. At this point I have no idea how to get around
> the macro expansion. I will at least add selinux-policy-devel package
> BuildRequire to the Packaging guidelines.
I eventually did that, I folded both BuildRequires into a single one for
selinux-policy-devel and it worked just fine.
> If you have any more issues with shipping custom policy, feel free to CC
> me so that I get to you sooner.
I think I really don't want the BuildRequires from the macro, they
look superfluous since my build is passing and I certainly don't want
to drag git needlessly in my buildroot.
The Requires on the other hand are a must, so many thanks for the macro.
One thing that I love is the ability to manage multiple modules at
once. Unfortunately I didn't find how to break the line in the RPM
spec:
> %selinux_modules_install %{_datadir}/selinux/%{selinuxtype}/mod1.cil
> %{_datadir}/selinux/%{selinuxtype}/mod2.pp
Breaking the line with back-slashes didn't work, the modules weren't
considered arguments to the macro:
> %selinux_modules_install \
> %{_datadir}/selinux/%{selinuxtype}/mod1.cil \
> %{_datadir}/selinux/%{selinuxtype}/mod2.pp
I tried %{selinux_modules_install} and other shenanigans but no luck.
I can live with a long line every now and then :)
Dridi
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
