Jason L Tibbitts III <[email protected]> writes:

>>>>>> "RH" == Robbie Harwood <[email protected]> writes:
>
> RH> If I backport this to fc29, will that assuage people's concerns?
>
> I think it would certainly help and I wouldn't complain.  In fact, I'd
> love to start running that as soon as I can.  However, it wouldn't
> help anyone who does a (supposedly supported) F28->F30 update.  I do
> not know if that is a significant concern.

Nothing would break, so it's technically correct to leave out right now
I think.  Since my f28 builds match f29 right now, I just did both:

fc28: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0956d60ffd
fc29: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d226c3ecf1

I've also updated the change page to mention that these warnings are
present (and the versions they start appearing in).

Thanks,
--Robbie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to