On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:55:22 +0100
Dan Horák <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:55 +0100
> "J. Scheurich" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > > I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement,
> >
> > What can be improvided ?
> > The srpm produces a valid rpm on all architecures,
> > all tips of
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481
> >
> > has been followed.
>
> well, I can't even see the spec file, the Spec URL: points to a web
> site, not to the spec file :-( There is a reason why the review
> template has this entry.
ah, there is a second review where it has been fixed
Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
