On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:44 AM Randy Barlow <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 11:56 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > > > This was not approved - there was a -1 vote and so it was > > > > > planned to be > > > > > discussed in the next meeting. > > > > > > > > I commented the ticket, but I will copy my response here: there > > > > was no > > > > single -1 within a week after opening a ticket so to my knowledge > > > > the > > > > ticket was approved. > > > > * The ticket had formal proposal offered (means that FESCo members > > can vote) > > * 6 FESCo members voted +1 within a week (which means that there were > > at least three "for" votes and no "against" votes) > > > > Considering 2 points above -- I can read that it is approved. Waiting > > for anyone to put note that it is approved is nice, but not must. If > > the policy is somehow different from what I have read, please update > > docs.fp.o and announce it. > > I suppose that's a fair interpretation of the wording in the policy, > though it wasn't my personal interpretation based off of memory. I > think I would generally prefer that people wait for the ticket to > officially say it's approved, but you are right that the policy doesn't > explicitly state that. > > In any case, fair enough, I retract my claim that it wasn't approved ☺ > For the record, your memory is faulty. When we reworked the policy, we made it explicit that once it passed that week, if it had at least +3 and no -1 votes, it was approved. This was to avoid FESCo's classic problem of taking forever to reach a decision on things. After that point, it's pending an *announcement*, but the ruling is official.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
