On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:43:48AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > It's also bad for archiving, since threads are inherently unstable. > Conversation splitting and merging is very awkward (as I've observed > in the Snapcraft Discourse). I can keep going, but it doesn't matter, > because you're dead set on this anyway.
I ... don't know how to engage constructively with this accusation, because it it seems to come from absolutely nowhere. Yes, we're *definitely* trying out Discourse. That's not a conspiracy — it's live! We're also trying out HyperKitty. It's live too! We try stuff! The rest of everything — development resources, infrastructure, whether there is widespread adoption — that's not something arguing over will change. When we can *see* something is not working, we can't just complain that those are unfair. we should try something else. But the comments from several people implying some sort of fait accompli here, that some backroom decision has been made, that we're somehow trying to destroy communication.... seriously? -- Matthew Miller <[email protected]> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
