On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 08:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 09/24/2018 03:24 AM, M A Young wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > > > Definitely an error. > > > > > > Could be another case of > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629396, but it > > > should have been fixed last week. Is your repo current? > > > Could you check for the presence of modular repodata (the > > > *modules.yaml.gz) file. > > > > the dnf upgrade problem looks to me like > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616118 > > It's actually fallout from https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7827 > > Basically we are building flatpaks from modules, but then the modules > are getting into the normal module stream. They shouldn't and we need to > setup some different tagging for them to avoid it.
Well, that's part of it, but dnf actually printing these messages is kind of a bug regardless. Even without that problem, there are always likely to be some "real" modules that have packages in them which are ahead of the non-modular package, and thus this bug will be prone to happen so long as dnf doesn't just treat this as a normal situation and print no warning message. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
