Thx for the answer. I opened upstream ticket to doublecheck this: https://github.com/tzinfo/tzinfo/issues/88
V. Dne 24.5.2018 v 19:32 Patsy Franklin napsal(a): > Hi, > > Thank you for your input on this! > > The concern is that, in some cases, applications that parse the tzdata > files were not expecting to find negative DST offsets (negative SAVE > values in the data files) despite the fact that POSIX appears to > support this. > > As this is now the default format for tzdata, these applications > should be fixed to recognize the negative DST offsets. > > (NOTE: For f26, f27 and f28, we have provided the rearguard format to > continue to support existing applications. This proposal announces > the transition to vanguard format, allowing time to update > applications in f29.) > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 4:51 AM, Vít Ondruch <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Is this going to be backward compatible or not? rubygem-tzinfo is > using > tzdata as data source, so I wonder if any action is required. > > > Yes, it's backward compatible if your application recognizes that > tzdata SAVE values/DST's can be negative. > > Thanks, > Patsy > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/J3HHRXVANGROHRNHQ4UZ4DNWVYXH3Z2H/
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/PCN57Q6P74RESICYD2HDF5BKGXDTNAX3/
