Late and off-topic by now, but in retrospect my response is closer to
stupid than the intended hyperbolic+funny.

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:21 PM, Chris Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Martin Kolman <[email protected]> wrote:

>> What about putting it on top of a thin-LV then ? With over provisioning you
>> could even share space efficiently between root & home and would get other
>> features such as efficient CoW snapshots.

> First order of business for making LVM thinp a default for
> Workstation: a one cycle release of the code of conduct for the Fedora
> Community as it pertains to the change, so they can feel free to ask
> things like "what kind of drugs were you guys on when making this
> decision?"

Criticism of negative user experience is not at all inhibited by the
code of conduct. And couching such criticism in hyperbole confuses the
argument I was trying to make, while also unintentionally suggests a
recommendation intended to result in better experience comes from
substance abuse. That's just gross and disappointing. And I apologize
for it.


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/I73XHY7WUHTOVLM5NQUWZGKGT4IQLQ2S/

Reply via email to