On Wed, Feb 21, 2018, 16:39 Pierre-Yves Chibon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > Hi All, > > >> > > > >> > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull > > >> > --rebase to pick up the new branch, > > >> > > >> One of my packages (syncthing) didn't get the new "f28" branch, is > > >> there a reason why? > > >> (It's not retired in rawhide.) > > > > > > It's not part of the package provided by the script updating pdc, but > that's a > > > symptom, I do not know why the script did not consider it. > > > > > > Looking at pdc, it looks like syncthing has no master branch at all: > > > > https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/?active=true&global_component=syncthing > > > > Well, that's ... unusual, I'd say? > > Whom do I have to poke to fix the pdc database entries, and to get an > > f28 branch? > > Just request the f28 as you would for any branches (you may want to request > master as well while at it :)). > Done! It's fixed now (although the master branch seems to have re-appeared in its own). Thank you! Fabio Seeing the chatter on the list earlier, it seems fedrepo_req will work > better > for f28 for the moment. > > > Pierre > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
