On 20 February 2018 at 13:11, Igor Gnatenko <[email protected]> wrote: [..] > today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own subpackage rpm- > sign-libs.
[root@tin ~]# rpm -e rpm-build-libs error: Failed dependencies: librpmbuild.so.8()(64bit) is needed by (installed) python3-rpm-4.14.1-6.fc28.1.x86_64 librpmsign.so.8()(64bit) is needed by (installed) python3-rpm-4.14.1-6.fc28.1.x86_64 [root@tin ~]# rpm -e rpm-build-libs python3-rpm error: Failed dependencies: python3-rpm >= 4.13.0-0.rc1.29 is needed by (installed) python3-dnf-2.7.5-8.fc28.noarch [root@tin ~]# rpm -e rpm-build-libs python3-rpm python3-dnf error: Failed dependencies: python3-dnf >= 2.7.0 is needed by (installed) python3-dnf-plugins-core-2.1.5-4.fc28.noarch python3-dnf < 3.0 is needed by (installed) python3-dnf-plugins-core-2.1.5-4.fc28.noarch python3-dnf = 2.7.5-8.fc28 is needed by (installed) dnf-2.7.5-8.fc28.noarch I'm only pointing to the fact that now package which name suggests that it has something to do with the building packages is required by @Core On top above now both (rpm-build-libs and rpm-sign-libs) still are required by the minimal set of packages. In other words, this and prev change introduces negative simplification factor. Maybe it would be good to review the content of the python3-rpm .. *maybe*. kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
