On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:50:57AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:31:46AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Hello,
> > as per subject, what is the stance on dropping anything there from a
> > rpm ? Either marked as %{config} or not ?
> >
> > My naive reading of the Packaging guidelines is that nothing should be
> > dropped in there by a package, but the guidelines only explicitly talk
> > about not putting "service" files in there.
>
> The packaging guidelines actually use 'unit file' as the term
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd#Filesystem_locations
>
> "Packages with systemd unit files *must* put them into %{_unitdir}.
> %{_unitdir} evaluates to /lib/systemd/system"
>
> From that I'd say any RPM putting unit files into /etc/systemd/system is
> not compliant, regardless of whether its a full unit file, or a override
> unit file in a '.d' directory.
Exactly. Distro packages putting files in /etc/systemd is also contrary
to systemd logic (/usr/lib is for packaging, /etc is for the admin).
Everything which can be put underneath /etc/systemd/system can be put under
/usr/lib/systemd/system also.
This nicely avoids any questions about %config vs %config(noreplace) vs.
anything else.
Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
