On 02/15/2017 08:12 AM, E.N. virgo wrote:
Greetings,
The LLVM project has been providing a C++ ABI for a while [1]. A naive user
like I'm would presume Fedora easily ships with that, as the saying goes:
“Fedora is a developer-friendly distro.” Unfortunately, that isn't the case for
this instance and if one is using clang++, they have to link against the GCC's
ABI instead of the LLVM's. Elsewhere, there is no such a quirk, see for
instance [2] and [3].
I'm not sure if I follow. Supporting multiple C++ ABIs would make
things more complicated for developers because they now have to figure
out which ABI their project needs and if all the libraries they want to
use are available with the right ABI.
I really don't think we should move in this direction.
Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
