Stephen Gallagher <[email protected]> wrote:

> What's wrong with doing:
> 
> Requires: isl%{?_isa} >= %{isl_version}
> 
> Other than you'll have to be aware and deal with any eventual soname bump, of
> course.

They bumped it somewhere between isl-0.14 (which gcc uses now) and isl-0.16.1
(which gcc wants to use).

David
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to