On Monday, 16 January 2017 at 16:32, Jan Kurik wrote:
[...]
> == Detailed Description ==
> User base of Fedora distribution with SSDs grows steadily and while
> the argument for kernel default setting not to enable the discard is
> still strong one it doesn't change the fact that vast majority of
> users (with SSDs) doesn't want to sacrifice better performance of
> drive with discard/trim enabled for the sake of secrecy.
How do you know that it's a vast majority?
[...]
> For LUKS1 metadata format we don't have a space to store the new
> default in metadata and therefore we can't flip the default for new
> LUKS1 devices being formated via libcryptsetup or cryptsetup utility.
>
> Changing the kernel default is of the table due to risk of data
^
I think you missed an 'f' here.----|
> corruption with some TrueCrypt configurations involving hidden
> volumes.
>
> For rotational devices the cost of enabled discard is negligible
How have you measured that? What is the exact value?
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
