On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 1:20 PM, drago01 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well I am trying to understand what you are trying to do before > thinking of solutions. > I think the 6 months cycle worked pretty well so far so I'd rather > only change it for good reasons.
I think that ignores that we're pretty much always slipping, and they aren't in fact 6 month cycles. There's always pressure to get the fall release done on time to avoid hitting end of year holiday season, and we have actually busted that also which has a few times really imploded the following release schedule. And then next the problem is that QA and releng at least do not have enough of their own development time. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
