On Pá, 2016-09-16 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 15:39 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >
> > We will also
> > add compat openssl102 package so the applications and other
> > dependencies which are not ported yet to the new API continue to
> > work.
> What plan do you have for libp11 and engine_pkcs11?
>
> Packaging guidelines state that packages SHOULD support PKCS#11 URIs
> if
> they support using certificates/keys via a filename.
>
> Which is made fairly trivial by libp11 and the engine. But only if
> it's
> actually *present* for the version of OpenSSL that you're building
> against...
Well... we certainly need to port it sooner or later although I
understand that effort will be quite non-trivial.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
(You'll never know whether the road is wrong though.)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
