Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> That is your interpretation. I see nothing on this page to support this
> claim. And actually it is contrary to format #3 logic, since its main
> difference with other changelog formats is that the version is not part of
> the entry header, so there's no reason to limit one entry to one version
It's blatantly obvious that all these formats have one thing in common:
there's one entry per new EVR. Our automated tools (e.g. make clog as
already pointed out by Michael Schwendt) also expect that. But I guess I'll
need to get the FPC to officially clarify this.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
