@Mousius to specifically answer your questions on IntImm for bool and int. 
Likely this is due to the way we use container and checkers. Right now IntImm 
is indeed designed to hold for int and bool. And we will need to specific type 
checking on dtype which might be missed in such a case. Differentiating bool 
and int in the special section will likely resolve the issue if we believe it 
is important to have special casing for bool

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/97#issuecomment-1376047312
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/97/c1376047...@github.com>

Reply via email to