Thanks @areusch , the particular section that you described was explicitly listed as "future opportunities" and is not part of the RFC which may or may not be executed. As per stated in the text
``` This section describes possible approaches to evolve the default build to leverage more of unity components. Note again that this is only a discussion of possible approach is not part of the RFC, but only to bring possible relevant context of future opportunities. The detailed discussions about the exact approach shall happen in dedicated RFCs for each incremental change to the default build. ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/12651#issuecomment-1233166870 You are receiving this because you commented. Message ID: <apache/tvm/issues/12651/1233166...@github.com>
