On the point about potentially incorporating symbolic shapes into Relay, I would like to hear more detail about how it can be done with Relay's system of accumulating type constraints and solving them simultaneously. If we were to handle dynamic shapes in Relay, we would need to define semantics for how shape variables are scoped and how assignments are handled, how they can be processed during the solving of type constraints, and what happens if symbolic shape expressions cannot be concluded to be the same at compile time. If this can be neatly incorporated into Relay, then it might make sense to pursue. I would be happy to brainstorm on that issue.
-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/89#issuecomment-1224450123 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/89/c1224450...@github.com>