> So if you define a variable in a quoted portion, you should be able to > reference it in the unquoted portion - From quoted to unquoted: Yes, that's correct. - From unquoted to quoted: For security concern, accessing values from unquoted portion will require explicit specification if the values are not basic atomic ones (int, float, str, None, etc)
> I am mostly curious about how the interactions between quoting and unquoting > will be defined and also how it would be implemented. The mechanism here is that the core logic is in IRBuilder, and the parser is only a thin wrapper of the IRBuilder. More specifically, any `T.xxx` is a call into the IRBuilder, in both quoted and unquoted portion, and the only difference is it's run by the interpreter or the parser. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/79#issuecomment-1198677227 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/79/c1198677...@github.com>
