> @kparzysz-quic, sorry, I'm still not understanding here - the name of the > kind is enough to look it up in the kind registry and gather any > kind-specific information. What further details are missing?
I thought the attrs were stored in the kind, but they are in the target itself. Nevermind. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/71#issuecomment-1185758537 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/71/c1185758...@github.com>
