Hi,
Thanks for your interest in this :) Regarding 1, this is a good point. Initially we were only intending to use rolling_buffer in our custom TIR lowering pipeline (doesn't use driver_api.cc), but I agree it'd be much better to also include it in the standard flow. I'll work on a patch to enable that. For 2, it's definitely a medium/long term ambition to migrate to TensorIR and I don't see a technical reason that would prevent it. However, TensorIR is still not very mature so I think this will only be considered once TensorIR reaches full parity with TE. If anyone else wishes to migrate it sooner though that'd be welcomed by me. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-introducing-a-rolling-buffer-scheduling-primitive/9836/4) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/7daf97b8999737a378559172c0c0bd0d45ba6802ddae32ddb7cb675c1079e569).
