[quote="areusch, post:4, topic:9643"] The main question I have though is: if we are just going to hoist tensors out of operator implementations, why do we need to have a way to lookup PrimFunc workspace size? Can’t we just get that by looking at the arguments? [/quote]
We think they will get hoisted to main TIR primfunc that is also a primfunc -- then there is an argument whether the unified planner reduce that into pools later. So this piece of work is a interrim solution until we have the comprehensive planner (which we think is bit bigger amount of work) to enhance the user experience by not having to guess the workspace buffer size that will be used by TVMBAW calls. I'll anwser other questions tommorow. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-utvm-query-intermediary-workspace-requirement/9643/5) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/9ae07d2c74429da26eb51304da1418ab834c08cf4da09203517fef667b74adf6).
