[quote="giuseros, post:29, topic:9206"] >From what I understand @kparzysz you are saying that the internal functions >don’t matter (they will be static private functions) but that the runner >function should have this signature. Can I ask you why? [/quote]
The reason is that this is the signature that we're currently using for all TVM-generated functions. To call a function like that all you need to know what parameters the function takes. This is essentially the definition of TVM-specific ABI, but on the level of the C language. This allows compilers to generate the same steps to call any function. If you want to develop a different ABI, it will need to be used for all external calls to functions generated by TVM, or else we lose that universality. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/implementing-aot-in-tvm/9206/31) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/2a3d6a93db01ed179d40d577fac62e6fa86535921392b726492d2e4876f589e2).
