Great, let's discuss Model Library Format a bit further on another RFC. I will try to start one early this week.
>> and a new command `tvmc micro gen-project` (or something) would be added to >> generate the e.g. Zephyr project. > >oh that’s cool. Copying (or generating) it from the template dir you mentioned >right? Yes. However, to refine this a bit and address a comment you made earlier to @manupa-arm: this template project shouldn't get used if we are just producing Model Library Format. The idea of the template project is to provide the necessary boilerplate/glue to configure an SoC to run a model given one in Model Library Format. The template project is tied to the implementation of the Project-level API. > Right, I think it is not indeed necessary to pass the SDK (like `zephyr` ) to > the `compile` command because I understand `build.relay` doesn’t need to know > anything about the “board” (contrary to what is used in the prototype of this > RFC document) and about the SDK used. `tvmc micro build` maybe should address > it? I think that sounds ok at a high level. >> For this, I’d propose that an e.g. git sha1 of the Project API repo should >> be enough. > > Sorry, I could not follow you here. Here I mean--if we are going to include something to describe the device configuration (similar to the `--target=zephyr -target=stm32f746xx -board=...` you proposed), the portion which describes the project template used should just be the git sha1 from the git repo that houses the template project and the Project-level API implementation. > By “device serial numbers” do you mean the usb serial device number? If so > currently we allow only one of such a device to be available and it’s probed, > failing if more than 1 serial port is available no? Maybe we should stick > with that default and add an option to the user to specify it when desired. > Anyway, I think that info should not be in the metadata, it should be left by > the user to specify when `tvmc micro flash` and `tvmc run` is executed? Yeah that's right, but you could override or choose a specific port when multiple identical boards are connected. I agree it should not be in metadata and instead passed to `flash` or `run` either explicitly on the command-line or in a `.gitignore`'d environment config file. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tvmc-add-support-for-tvm/9049/10) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/81c538b1f23e7e1cd90e7bffe5e6970fe573bf47c0cfbcea1a2f47c5c3d12c32).
