> could you be a bit more specific wrt your API design comment?
Sorry, I meant to be consistent with the registry API / implementation defined at [src/runtime/registry.cc](https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/blob/master/src/runtime/registry.cc). Specifically, I think it's better to implement Registry::Manager for CRT, instead of implementing TVMFuncRegistry, which changed the consistency between the two runtime implementations. In addition, the name for such implement could be `registry.c` to maintain consistency. Maintaining consistency helps existing users of the default runtime to easily switch to CRT for their resource constrained systems. And it'll be easier for future contributors to dive into the implementation. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-misra-c-changes-for-rpc-support/7098/5) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/4b7a19ba2219668850f3e20aa468191f7550f38b0e046501f8be23b0038fb911).
