I agree with @tqchen. Probably we should wait and see how Ansor log looks like and include it into the design. We could have @merrymercy comment on this.
In the high level, I suggest we have five fields: **target**, workload, config, results, version. The only change is taking the target out of the original input field, while having the workload describes the computation. I agree that protobuf is good for this purpose. But I'd prefer that we still output the log into a text format so that it'll be easy to quickly check the details. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-canonicalizing-autotvm-log-format/7038/7) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/52338540d2faed1a7e9ee6d18880be428536db610043925fcf5741d9d1835e7c).
