Also I think a benchmark to cover more models on more platforms would be necessary if we want to replace major part in the system. In addition, we can probably consider different methods of codegen in tvm as baseline. One example is that currently we use TVM+MKLDNN for bert on x86 cpu since x86 dense schedule is far less efficient than MKLDNN. By benchmarking all these different methods against Ansor, we can better understand the capability and boundary of Ansor(Tradeoffs between peprformance, tuning time and extra library dependency).
--- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-ansor-an-auto-scheduler-for-tvm-autotvm-v2-0/7005/4) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/0d86d3913b4629e8b3c520ddd03e887ef5d73f977f382d4756eb169c1220b097).
